Correction & Retraction Policy

Maintaining academic record integrity through transparent correction and retraction procedures.

Correction & Retraction Policy

The Global Review of Ideas and Innovation recognizes the importance of maintaining an accurate and reliable academic record. If an error or oversight is identified in a published article, the editorial board will issue a correction notice to amend the record transparently.

Transparent Process

Corrections and retractions are made with clear explanations and linked to the original publication to preserve the transparency of the academic record.

Correction Process

If an error or oversight is identified in a published article, the editorial board will issue a correction notice to amend the record transparently. In cases of serious errors that affect the validity or integrity of the findings, the article may be retracted in accordance with COPE guidelines.

Retraction Criteria

Serious Errors

Errors affecting validity or integrity

COPE Guidelines

Following established standards

Transparency

Clear explanations provided

Linked Records

Connected to original publication

Reporting Process

Authors, readers, or institutions may bring potential errors or concerns to the attention of the editorial office, which will review each case carefully and impartially before taking appropriate action. The editorial board ensures that all corrections and retractions are handled with the utmost care and transparency.

Types of Corrections

Minor Corrections

Typographical or formatting errors

Major Corrections

Errors affecting interpretation

Retractions

Serious errors or misconduct

Impartial Review

The editorial office will review each case carefully and impartially before taking appropriate action.

Academic Record Integrity

The journal is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity. All corrections and retractions are handled with transparency and linked to the original publication to preserve the complete academic record. This approach ensures that the scholarly community can track the evolution of research findings.

Policy Features

Transparent process
COPE guidelines
Impartial review
Linked records