Peer Review Policy
The Global Review of Ideas and Innovation employs a double-blind peer-review process, meaning that both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the evaluation period. Each submitted manuscript is first screened by the editorial office to ensure compliance with the journal's aims, scope, and formatting requirements.
Double-Blind Process
Both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the evaluation period.
Review Process
Suitable manuscripts are then assigned to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. Reviewers assess submissions for originality, clarity, methodological soundness, and contribution to existing scholarship. Their feedback is designed to be constructive, guiding authors toward strengthening their arguments and presentation.
Review Criteria
Originality
Novel contributions to knowledge
Clarity
Clear and coherent presentation
Methodology
Sound research methods
Contribution
Value to existing scholarship
Editorial Decision
The editorial decision—acceptance, revision, or rejection—is based on the reviewers' recommendations and the editor's assessment of the paper's overall quality. The peer-review process is treated as a collaborative and educational dialogue between authors and experts, ensuring that published work meets the highest academic standards.
Review Timeline
Submission
Initial manuscript submission
Review
Double-blind peer review
Decision
Editorial decision
Collaborative Process
The peer-review process is treated as a collaborative and educational dialogue between authors and experts.
Reviewer Selection
Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the relevant field, their publication record, and their experience with peer review. The journal maintains a diverse pool of reviewers from different geographical regions and academic institutions to ensure comprehensive evaluation.