Essential component of our editorial process ensuring quality and expertise in peer review.
Reviewer management is an essential component of the editorial process.
The journal maintains a diverse and international pool of reviewers with expertise in various disciplines related to technology, law, innovation, and social science. Editors are responsible for selecting reviewers who are free of conflicts of interest and capable of providing thorough and objective assessments.
Reviewers are chosen for their scholarly experience, prior publication record, and familiarity with the subject matter of the submission. Editors must monitor reviewer performance, ensure that deadlines are respected, and provide guidance when necessary.
The editorial office also evaluates the quality and tone of reviewer reports to maintain consistency in feedback and uphold the journal's professional standards. New reviewers are regularly invited to join the journal's database to ensure a constant renewal of expertise and perspectives.
International reviewers with multidisciplinary expertise.
Careful screening to avoid conflicts of interest.
Selection based on scholarly experience and subject knowledge.
Regular evaluation of reviewer quality and timeliness.